Comments on: Surah Tiyn, Verse 8

By: muhammed omer

muhammed omer — Sat, 12 Jun 2010 16:10:36 +0000

Dear sir,
In which web site I could all holly Quran Surahs in numerical table form.

Thanks.

By: mohammed

mohammed — Tue, 09 Feb 2010 14:20:55 +0000

i am learning arabic at the moment and your email address wld be much appreciated, so i can email you for quick replies, if you dont mind, i am in egypt learning. jazakalahair may allah (swt) reward you.

By: Nabeel

Nabeel — Sun, 06 Dec 2009 03:12:14 +0000

It is interesting to note that بِ: Bi the harfu-jarr in this verse is called an “addition بِ ” since the verse would still make sense and be grammatically correct without it. The بِ in this vesre as arabic scholars say is used for emphasis.

Also I’m still trying to figure out why أَحْكَمِ has a kasra since an ISm Tafdeel is Ghary munsarif.

By: Arabic Analysis of Surah At-Teen – Ilm Fruits

Arabic Analysis of Surah At-Teen – Ilm Fruits — Sun, 30 Aug 2009 07:31:56 +0000

[...] the last verse, I’m going to again refer to an existing post on Arabic Tree for the sake of [...]

By: ArabicTree

ArabicTree — Thu, 27 Aug 2009 17:33:34 +0000

@Naoman Jazakumullahu khayran.

@Syeed sound masculine plurals always end in fatha. The way they show case is by the waw or yaa. So “Al-Haakimoon” is marfoo’, and Al-Haakimeen is majroor or mansoob.

Similar with Al-Muslimeen vs. Al-Muslimoon, Al-Kaafireen vs. Al-Kaafiroon, etc.

By: syeed

syeed — Sat, 08 Aug 2009 07:47:46 +0000

Assalaamu alaikum!

I am new to Arabic, so I couldn’t understand some points. Please help me.

it is written that “Al-Haakimeen” is majroor but I see the word took fatha rather that kasra. the rule says “If the word is genitive (majruwr), it takes the kasra case”

or is there something I miss?

By: Naoman

Naoman — Sat, 17 Jan 2009 16:40:21 +0000

Assalaamu alaikum!

Mashaa Allah very well explained, for better understanding, “Al-Haakimeen” is majroor because of Idafa construction (Ahkamul Haakimeen), because of preposition “bi” the first term of Idafa (Ahkam)becomes majroor from its original case marfoo, and the 2nd term of idafa (Al-Haakimeen) is always majroor and definite by Al or possessive suffixes.

I hope this helps for better understanding.

Jazaak Allah Khair.

By: sheepoo

sheepoo — Tue, 02 Oct 2007 13:13:27 +0000

Might I suggest a small correction?
You have said:
Lafdhuw Jalaala here is marfoo‘ (because it has dumma); therefore, it’s ismu-laysa.

In my opinion it is the other way round: since it is the Ism u laysa therefore it is marfoo

Jazak Allah!

By: Hafsa

Hafsa — Mon, 01 Oct 2007 14:26:45 +0000

assalamu alaykum,

Jazak Allah for the informative explanation.

IMHO, With tarkeeb’s, creating a table helps. It’s just more visual.