Posts
The Faa’il in Verb Duals
By ArabicTree | October 15, 2008
If you’re familiar with verb conjugation, you’ll know that the form of the verb usually has the faa’il in it–for example, the faa’il in kharajuw (خَرَجُو) is the waw (waw-ul-jam’ah). But what about the duals?
In the dual forms, the faa’il is the alif–which is called Alif-ul-Uthayn (الِفُ الأثَينِ).
So in maadi, the alif is evident in humaa and antumaa, like so:
أنتُما خَرَجتُما
In mudaari’, the alif is evident in all the duals–humaa and antumaa, masculine and feminine:
أنتُما تَخرانِ
And that’s it! We’re not going into much more detail other than this; just remember that you don’t want to add a second faa’il in the form of some marfoo’ verbs.
Wallahu ‘alim.
Topics: Grammar, Intermediate | 1 Comment »
Related Posts:- Laam-ut-Ta’leel
- Verbal Sentences
- The Fa’il in Maadi
- Verbs with More Than One Maf’ool
- Intermediate Topics in Masdar
Kam: How Many
By ArabicTree | October 3, 2008
In Arabic, when you want to ask how much or how many of something, you use the word “kam”:
Kam means “how much” or “how many,” depending on the context. The word immediately after kam–the thing you’re asking about–is always singular and mansoob.
Here are some examples:
How many brothers do you have? Here, akhan is singular and mansoob. Note that the English is plural–brothers–even though the Arabic is singular–brother.
How much for this watch? Here, kam means “how much,” not “how many.” Though, commonly, people get lazy and just say “kam haadha?” for something they want to buy.
How many cats are eating the fish? Qittah (cats, here) is singular and mansoob, even though the word qittah is translated into English as “cats.”
And that’s kam, in a nutshell!
Topics: Grammar, Intermediate | 3 Comments »
Related Posts:- No related posts
Fi’l Mudaari’: Present and Future Tense
By ArabicTree | September 2, 2008
In Arabic, fi’l al-mudaari’ (the present/future-tense verb) can represent either the present or the future tense verb. So the question arises: how do you know if it’s being used in a present or future tense?
For example, if someone says to you:
Does this mean “I am drinking tea” or “I will drink tea”? If you can see the person, no problem!–you can tell if they’re drinking tea or not right now. But what if you read a sentence like this in a book?
The answer is context; the same way Arabs (meaning people who speak and understand Arabic) understand without vowels, they understand tense by context. Subhanallah! What about the rest of us?
As it turns out, you can explicitly specify that the verb is present- or future-tense. Let’s go by example. Our original sentence was:
If we want to make it present-tense, we say:
The addition of al-aana (الانَ) means “now”; so you can translate this sentence as: “I am drinking tea right now.” Which makes it present-tense! Notice you could NOT say “I will drink tea right now”–it doesn’t make sense! So al-aana removes the ambiguity and makes it present-tense.
What about future tense? There are two ways you can achieve this:
- By the addition of the letter seen:
سَأَشرُبُ الشَايَ
The addition of seen makes it future tense; so you can translate as “I will drink tea.”
- By the addition of the word sawfa:
سَوفَ أَشرُبُ الشَايَ
The addition of sawfa makes it future tense; so you can translate as “I will drink tea.”
Both are equivalent, seen and sawfa–there’s no difference in the meaning. Also, unlike al-aana, you do not explicitly translate the seen or sawfa into a word (at least, in English).
To summarize: Mudaari’ verbs can be present-tense or future tense; you can explicitly specify it as present-tense (by adding al-aana) or future-tense (by adding seen or sawfa).
Wallahu ‘alim.
Topics: Grammar, Intermediate | 10 Comments »
Related Posts:- Negating With Maa and Laa
- Negate Future Tense With “Lan”
- Fi’l Amr: The Imperative
- Lam Makes Mudaari’ Verbs Majzoom
- Intermediate Topics in Masdar
Words on the Pattern of Faa’il
By ArabicTree | August 24, 2008
Bismillah. It’s been a while since we had a post (due to family stuff); so insha’Allah we’ll go with something easy.
In Arabic, words on the pattern of faa’il (فاعل) denote a doer of an action. Here are some common words you probably know on the pattern of faa’il:
- طالِب Taalib: student
- عالِم ‘Aalim: scholar. (’Allama means to teach; ‘alima to learn)
- حاكِم Haakim: judge
- صادِق Saadiq: friend. The root word is sadaqa, which means to be truthful; from an Arabic language perspective, friends are the ones who tell you the truth!
Here are some words from the Qur’an and Sunnah on the pattern of faa’il:
- كافِر Kaafir: disbeliever, the one who does kafara (disbelief)
- كاذِب Kaathib: liar (the one who does kathaba)
- مالِك Maalik: king
- راحِم Raahim: merciful person (the one who does rahmah)
Here are some names of Allah (سبحانه وتعالى) on the pattern of faa’il:
- الخالِق Al-Khaaliq: The Creator, the one who creates out of nothing (the one who does khalaqa)
- الهادى Al-Haadiy: the one who guides; The Guide
- البارى Al-Baariy: the one who forms, who evolves, life
Wallahu ‘alim. For more details on the intricate meanings of Allah’s names, you can try the GodNames.org sitemap (it has a list of names). You can also try Ilm Fruits, they have details on a few names (Al-Ghaffaar, Al-Ghafuwr, Al-Haleem, and Al-Qahhar).
Topics: Vocabulary | 3 Comments »
Related Posts:- Some Arabic Patterns
- Intermediate Topics in Masdar
- Sound Masculine Plural
- Verbal Sentences
- Singular Feminine Words
Amr and ‘Umar
By ArabicTree | July 12, 2008
If you know a bit about the history of the Arabic language, historically, Arabic had no dots or tashkeel (vowels). This makes life tricky; sometimes, you cannot tell what the word is except by context. Certain combination of words look the same. Like mi’atun and minhu.
Another combination are the two names Amr (عَمَر) and ‘Umar (عُمَر). Notice that when you take the dots and tashkeel away, the two names look exactly the same! And this is a problem, because the Arabs didn’t have taskheel and dots before.
So how do they resolve this? The same way as mi’atun and minhu: they add an extra letter. So ‘Amr is written like so:
The extra waw is not pronounced–it simply exists to distinguish the two names.
And why is it still there today? Allahu ‘alim, Arabs don’t put taskheel except when necessary. So the majority of written Arabic has no tashkeel in it; so these things are still necessary.
Topics: Grammar, Intermediate | 3 Comments »
Related Posts: Can't get enough of Arabic? Subscribe to our RSS feed or email notification to get instant updates for new posts!Why Mi’atun has an Alif
By ArabicTree | June 21, 2008
If you’ve been studying Arabic for a while, you’ll notice something very interesting with respect to alif, waw, and ya.
As a rule, every single time you see the letter alif, the letter before it takes fatha–and the alif just lengthens the “aa” sound.
And the same with waw and yaa–waw is preceded by damma, and yaa is preceded by kasra.
However, there is one exception–the word mi’atun (مِائَةٌ), which has a kasra before the alif. And what’s more, it’s not even pronounced! What’s up with that?
Recall that Arabic writing evolved in stages before reaching what it is today. Earlier additions were quite different–fonts and style aside–in that they contained no nuqat (dots) or tashkeel (vowels).
And Arabs could read and understand, subhanallah, like that!
But, take a look at this–say you remove the extra alif in mi’atun. With nuqat and tashkeel, it looks like this: مِئَةٌ
Once you remove the nuqat and tashkeel, it looks like this: مئه
And notice the word minhu–with nuqat and tashkeel, it looks like this: مِنهُ and without it … it looks exactly the same as minhu: منه
So to get around this, the Arabs added an extra alif to mi’atun. It’s not maatun, or miaatun; the alif is merely there because it disambiguates.
Wallahu ta’ala ‘alim.
Topics: Uncategorized | No Comments »
Related Posts:- The Faa’il in Verb Duals
- Al-Maqsuwr
- Badal: Something that Stands in for Something Else
- Definite and Indefinite
- The Nominal Sentence
Separating Mudaf and Mudaf Ilayh
By ArabicTree | June 15, 2008
In the possessive case, the mudaf follows the mudaf ilayh. Check this out:
In this sentence, the mudaf is qalam, and the mudaf ilayh is Muhammad. Let’s play with this sentence; we want to say “this is Muhammad’s new pen” instead of just “this is Muhammad’s pen.” How would we accomplish this?
If you know na’at and man’oot, you might formulate a sentence like this:
Not a bad first try! But there’s a problem with this sentence–you cannot separate the mudaf and the mudaf ilayh! It’s illegal (in the rules of Arabic grammar)!
So how can you formulate the sentence, then? Perhaps like this:
You might ask, how do we know this doesn’t mean “this is the pen of the new Muhammad?” The answer lies in the rules of na’at and man’oot–since they match in number, gender, definitivity, and case, you can easily tell that jadeed applies to qalam–because if it applied to Muhammad, it would be jadeedin, not jadeedu.
Topics: Uncategorized | 4 Comments »
Related Posts:- Possessive Case (Mudaf and Mudaf Ilayh)
- Comparative and Superlative
- Masdar: The Verbal Noun
- The Number System From 11-19
- Some Arabic Patterns
Transitive and Intransitive Verbs
By ArabicTree | June 7, 2008
In English and Arabic, we can classify verbs as both transitive and intransitive. (Does anyone know the Arabic terms for these words?)
Transitive verbs are verbs that take a maf’ool (an object, or recipient of the verb). In English, transitive verbs include: eat (eat what?), and say (say what?).
Intransitive verbs take no maf’ool–they’re just there by themselves. This includes verbs like swim, skate, and die (in English).
Some transitive verbs in Arabic include:
- akala/ya’kulu (أكَل\يَأكُل): to eat
- shariba/yashrubu (شرِب\يَشرُبُ): to drink
- dakhala/yadkhulu (دخَلَ\يَدخُلُ): to enter
- qara’a/yaqra’u (قرَأ\يَقرَأ): to recite
- ‘arafa/ya’rifu (عرَف\يَعرِفُ): to know
Some intransitive verbs in Arabic include:
- khajara/yakhruju (خرَج\يَخرُجُ): to exit
- maata/yamuwtu (مات\يَمُوتُ): to die
- thahaba/yathhabu (ذهَب\يَذهَبُ): to go
Some intransitive verbs indirectly take a maf’ool through a harful-jarr–verbs like kharaja and thahaba, which take min and ila respectfully (you’ll notice a few of the above verbs are like that).
So you can say:
The teacher left from the class. Notice the use of min. Similarly, with dakhala, you can say:
The students went into the class. Notice the use of ila.
And be careful! Verbs that are intransitive in English might be transitive in Arabic, and verbs that are transitive in English might be intransitive in Aarabic–so don’t assume anything! For example, thahaba (to go) is intransitive in Arabic, but transitive in English–you can say “I went home,” but you can’t say “thahabtu as-suwqa.”
As we mentioned, some transitive verbs take more than one maf’ool; but these, we’ll cover as a separate topic, bi idhnillah.
Topics: Uncategorized | 11 Comments »
Related Posts:- Verbs with More Than One Maf’ool
- Laam-ut-Ta’leel
- Lam Makes Mudaari’ Verbs Majzoom
- Negating With Maa and Laa
- The Faa’il in Verb Duals
Fi’l Amr: The Imperative
By ArabicTree | May 10, 2008
When you study fi’l mudaari, one of the things teachers always place emphasis on the harakah of aynul-kalimah, the vowel on the second letter of the root word. It’s yasalu, not yasulu or yasilu.
And this is important because it comes into play in fi’l amri. Fi’l amri–commands, or the imperative–are for second-person.
Let’s look at the verb kataba/yaktubu. The second-person (anta) is taktubu.
To convert a mudaari’ verb to an amr, you need to:
- Delete the ta (harf-ul-mukhaatabah, the letter of second-person). So taktubu تَكتُبُ becomes ktubu كتُبُ.
- Put sukoon on the last letter. Ktubu becomes ktub كتُب.
- Add a hamzatul-wasl to the front. Because you can’t pronounce a word with sukoon on the first letter. So it becomes uktub اُكتُب.
And why uktub and not aktub or iktub? Because of the harakah on aynul-kalimah–damma!
Let’s take another example–jalasa/yajlisu. So starting with tajlisu تَجلِسُ, we:
- Slash the ta–jlisu جلِسُ
- Add sukoon to the end–jlis جلِس
- Add alif to the front–ijlis اِجلِس
Got it? No, wait! Let’s try fataha/yaftahu (starting with تَفتَحُ:
- Slash the ta–ftahu فتَحُ
- Add sukoon to the end–ftah فتَح
- Add alif to the front–aftah? No! Not aftah–it looks like aftuhu (the mudaari’ for waahid mutakallim). It becomes iftah! اِفتَح
And the harakah on the hamza? It depends on the harakah on aynul-kalimah in mudaari. Kasra in mudaari becomes kasra in amr; damma in mudaari’ becomes damma in amr; and fatha in mudaari’ becomes kasra in amr.
So it’s easy–just follow the three steps. And once you get practiced at it, your brain will fil in the three steps for you, and you can jump straight from mudaari’ to amr.
What about for pronouns other than anta? Compare them to anta, and see the additions.
- Anta: if’al إفعَل.
- Antum: if’aluw إفعَلُو. The addition is waw-u-jam’aah, which is also the fa’il.
- Anti: if’aliy إفعَلِي. The addition is yaa-u-mukhaatabah, which is also the fa’il.
- Antunna: if’alna إفعَلنَ. The addition is noon-u-niswaa, which is also the fa’il.
And that’s fi’l amri, the imperative form!
Topics: Grammar, Intermediate | 1 Comment »
Related Posts: Can't get enough of Arabic? Subscribe to our RSS feed or email notification to get instant updates for new posts!Badal: Something that Stands in for Something Else
By ArabicTree | May 3, 2008
البَدَل–badal–means “something that stands in for something else,” or “something that replaces something else.”
The rules for badal are:
- The badal itself must be an ismul-ishaarah (demonstrative pronoun)–such as haadhaa.
- The word after the badal must be a common-noun (not a proper name)
- The word after the badal must be definite (with alif-lam, usually)
And that word–the definite common-noun that follows the badal–is the word that the badal stands in for.
So if you say:
(This house is big.) In this sentence, haadha is the badal–it’s ismul-ishaarah, it’s followed by a common noun (bayt) that’s definite with alif-lam.
Another example is:
(These hujjaaj–pilgrims–are from America.) The badal here is haoolaai; it’s ismul-isharah, and it’s followed by a common noun (hujjaaj) that’s definite with alif-lam.
But why do we care about which word is badal? Why does it mater,grammatically?
Check out this sentence:
(Your pen is in this bag.) The badal here is haadhihi; it’s ismul-ishaarah, and it’s followed by a common-noun (haqiybah) that’s definite with alif-lam.
And notice that the badal never changes case–rather, the word that the badal is standing in for takes its case.
Like here–the badal is haadhihi, and the word it’s standing in for is haqiybah. And haqiybah is majruwr, because of fiy–fiy affects haadhihi, and haadhihi is badal–so it passes on themajruwr case to haqiybah!
Here’s another example to demonstrate that:
(I recited this surah in Salaatil-Fajr). The badal here is haadhihi–ismul-ishaarah, followed by a common noun with alif-lam. The badal stands in for surah.
And here, surah is mansoob. Why? Because of qara’a–qara’a has a mafool, haadhihi. But because haadhihi is badal for surah, surah becomes mansoob, not haadhihi.
And that’s badal!–something that stands in for something else. You can think of badal as a rubber ball–whatever case hits it, bounces onto the next word (that it affects).
To recap:
- The badal word is an ismul-ishaara that is followed by a definite common noun. That noun is what the badal stands in for.
- The badal passes its case to the word it stands in for–like a rubber ball, it passes the case to the word it stands in for.
What ayaat of the Qur’an have badal in them? Post some in the comments insha’Allah (quoting the verse and pointing out the badal).
Topics: Beginner, Grammar | 5 Comments »
Related Posts: Can't get enough of Arabic? Subscribe to our RSS feed or email notification to get instant updates for new posts!